Adds the referential models, the first database-backed settings screens, and the register the compliance matrix requires before any parameter is enforceable. The register is the point of the lot. The matrix is explicit that copying another product's configuration is not enough — each parameter must carry its value, source, effective date, population and an approver. Approval records the session's actor, never a form field: a signature you can type yourself is worth nothing. The screen names the domains that have no approved parameter yet, so the gap is visible rather than assumed closed. Two bugs of the same family, both now structurally impossible: - The Prisma scoping extension read a hand-written list of models carrying accountId. The four models added here were missing from it, so writes failed with an opaque Prisma error — and a read would have silently returned every account's rows. The list is now derived from the schema itself. - The RLS policies were likewise per-table. A new integration test fails if any table with an accountId column lacks forced RLS and both policies, which is the failure mode that hides best: nobody writes a wrong rule, someone forgets to write one. An end-to-end test signs in as a manager and confirms the settings screens refuse to render — the sidebar hiding them is a convenience, the server check is the control. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Cr9dkEHwbDgkWPnyGj1Rjv
157 lines
4.6 KiB
TypeScript
157 lines
4.6 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, it } from 'vitest';
|
||
|
||
import {
|
||
authorize,
|
||
AuthorizationError,
|
||
can,
|
||
canForMember,
|
||
inScope,
|
||
type Actor,
|
||
} from '@/domain/access/authorize';
|
||
import {
|
||
DEFAULT_ROLE_PERMISSIONS,
|
||
PERMISSION_CODES,
|
||
SYSTEM_ROLES,
|
||
} from '@/domain/access/permissions';
|
||
|
||
function actor(overrides: Partial<Actor> = {}): Actor {
|
||
return {
|
||
membershipId: 'm1',
|
||
accountId: 'acc1',
|
||
userId: 'u1',
|
||
roleKey: 'manager',
|
||
permissions: new Set(['planning.view']),
|
||
scope: { allLocations: false, locationIds: ['loc1'], teamIds: [] },
|
||
...overrides,
|
||
};
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
describe('can', () => {
|
||
it('refuse une capacité absente', () => {
|
||
expect(can(actor(), 'planning.publish')).toBe(false);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
it('accorde une capacité présente', () => {
|
||
expect(can(actor(), 'planning.view')).toBe(true);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
it('refuse hors du compte, même avec la capacité', () => {
|
||
// Le cas qui compte : détenir le droit ne dit rien du périmètre.
|
||
expect(
|
||
can(actor(), 'planning.view', { accountId: 'autre-compte' }),
|
||
).toBe(false);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
it('refuse un établissement hors périmètre', () => {
|
||
expect(can(actor(), 'planning.view', { locationId: 'loc2' })).toBe(false);
|
||
expect(can(actor(), 'planning.view', { locationId: 'loc1' })).toBe(true);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
it('accorde tous les établissements au périmètre global', () => {
|
||
const director = actor({
|
||
scope: { allLocations: true, locationIds: [], teamIds: [] },
|
||
});
|
||
expect(can(director, 'planning.view', { locationId: 'loc99' })).toBe(true);
|
||
});
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
describe('authorize', () => {
|
||
it('lève quand la capacité manque', () => {
|
||
expect(() => authorize(actor(), 'planning.publish')).toThrow(
|
||
AuthorizationError,
|
||
);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
it('lève quand le périmètre ne couvre pas la ressource', () => {
|
||
expect(() =>
|
||
authorize(actor(), 'planning.view', { locationId: 'loc2' }),
|
||
).toThrow(/périmètre/);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
it('ne lève pas quand tout est réuni', () => {
|
||
expect(() =>
|
||
authorize(actor(), 'planning.view', { locationId: 'loc1' }),
|
||
).not.toThrow();
|
||
});
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
describe('canForMember', () => {
|
||
const employee = actor({
|
||
permissions: new Set(['counters.view_own']),
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
it('permet de voir ses propres compteurs', () => {
|
||
expect(
|
||
canForMember(employee, 'counters.view_own', 'counters.view_others', 'm1'),
|
||
).toBe(true);
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
it('refuse ceux des autres sans la capacité dédiée', () => {
|
||
// L'audit relève ces deux droits explicitement séparés : les confondre
|
||
// ouvrirait les compteurs de toute l'équipe à chaque salarié.
|
||
expect(
|
||
canForMember(employee, 'counters.view_own', 'counters.view_others', 'm2'),
|
||
).toBe(false);
|
||
});
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
describe('inScope', () => {
|
||
it('accepte une ressource sans périmètre précisé', () => {
|
||
expect(inScope(actor())).toBe(true);
|
||
});
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
describe('catalogue de capacités', () => {
|
||
it('n’attribue que des capacités existantes', () => {
|
||
// Une faute de frappe dans une attribution donnerait un rôle qui ne peut
|
||
// rien faire, sans erreur au démarrage.
|
||
const known = new Set(PERMISSION_CODES);
|
||
for (const role of SYSTEM_ROLES) {
|
||
for (const code of DEFAULT_ROLE_PERMISSIONS[role.key]) {
|
||
expect(known.has(code), `${role.key} : capacité inconnue ${code}`).toBe(
|
||
true,
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
it('réserve la délégation du niveau propriétaire', () => {
|
||
for (const role of SYSTEM_ROLES) {
|
||
const has = DEFAULT_ROLE_PERMISSIONS[role.key].includes(
|
||
'role_config.assign_owner_level',
|
||
);
|
||
expect(has, `${role.key}`).toBe(role.key === 'owner');
|
||
}
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
it('ne donne pas les réglages au manager', () => {
|
||
const manager = DEFAULT_ROLE_PERMISSIONS.manager;
|
||
for (const code of [
|
||
'settings.access',
|
||
'settings.locations.manage',
|
||
'settings.agreement.manage',
|
||
'members.salary.view',
|
||
'payroll.access',
|
||
]) {
|
||
expect(manager, `manager ne doit pas détenir ${code}`).not.toContain(code);
|
||
}
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
it('donne à l’employé le strict nécessaire', () => {
|
||
const employee = DEFAULT_ROLE_PERMISSIONS.employee;
|
||
expect(employee).toContain('timeoff.request');
|
||
expect(employee).toContain('counters.view_own');
|
||
expect(employee).not.toContain('counters.view_others');
|
||
expect(employee).not.toContain('timeoff.decide');
|
||
expect(employee).not.toContain('planning.publish');
|
||
});
|
||
|
||
it('utilise des codes stables de la forme ressource.action', () => {
|
||
for (const code of PERMISSION_CODES) {
|
||
expect(code, `${code} doit être en minuscules avec des points`).toMatch(
|
||
/^[a-z_]+(\.[a-z_]+)+$/,
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
});
|
||
});
|