Claude
4c0f6e9b95
The employer confirmed three things: some managers are on forfait jours, the working week is 35h, and there is no company-level agreement. The third one invalidates an earlier claim in the plan. Sunday: the spec attributed the 100% rate to a company agreement. With no such agreement, and the branch setting no Sunday rate, the basis is article L3132-27 on mayor-authorised Sundays. That article requires pay at least doubled AND compensatory rest of equal duration, and caps the year at twelve such Sundays. The plan only carried the pay side, so working a Sunday would have silently skipped a distinct entitlement. Adds SUNDAY_MAYOR_QUOTA and writes the rest to the ledger. Which Sunday regime the stores operate under still needs confirming, since the compensation differs. Forfait jours: brought into scope. IDCC 1517 is the enabling agreement, so no company agreement is needed. Contracts carry workTimeArrangement, the 218-day cap, and the individual written agreement without which activation is refused. Such contracts leave the hourly rules but stay under the rest rules, and gain their own workload-review obligations. Adds ForfaitDayEntry, WorkloadReview and a three-year retention line. Records that no rule in scope now rests on a company norm: no derogation to 12h days, no 46h average, no in-house annualisation. Refreshes the matrix to the version carrying the explicit minors stop signal. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Cr9dkEHwbDgkWPnyGj1Rjv